1, THERE WILL BE NO CLASS THIS WEEK BUT STUDENTS
WILL MEET INDIVIDUALLY FOR CONFERENCES.
Patterson Hall, Room 429, at scheduled time. Please
bring all work to the meeting (unless I have it already)
HOMEWORK: DUE April 3, 2007
1, READING
Ch.10 pages, (170 - 204) In EAA, Ch.4 in TSIS
ALSO --for Documenting Sources (CITATION)
there are good examples in EAC, pg 424- 442
2, Post your weekly blog entry.
3, Comment on NY times article below. Answer the
questions - a, What is the author's claim? Do you agree
with this claim? Use quotes to support your comment.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/25/opinion/25gilbert.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
March 25, 2007
Op-Ed Contributor
Compassionate Commercialism
By DANIEL GILBERT
Cambridge, Mass.
IN an advertising campaign that began last week, Nissan left 20,000 sets of keys in bars, stadiums, concert halls and other public venues. Each key ring has a tag that says: “If found, please do not return. My next generation Nissan Altima has Intelligent Key with push-button ignition, and I no longer need these.”
This campaign is clever, but not particularly original.
It was 1997, and the man who was crouched on the sidewalk at 68th and Broadway in New York City was one of the most pathetic souls I’d ever seen. His limbs were twisted in what appeared to be arthritic agony and tears were streaming down his face. “Please,” he whimpered. “Please, somebody help me.”
Most passers-by did what they were named for, but my wife and I stopped. The man looked up. “Please,” he sobbed. “I just want to go home.” My hand needed no guidance from my brain as it reached into my wallet and extracted $10. “Thank you,” he said as I handed him the money. “Thank you so much.” My wife and I mumbled some embarrassed words and walked on.
We hadn’t gone a block when she tugged my sleeve. “Maybe we should have gotten him into a cab,” she said. “He could barely stand up. He might need help. We should go back to see.” My wife is the patron saint of lost kittens and there is no arguing, so we went back to see. And what we saw was our horribly crippled friend walking briskly and happily up 68th Street, opening the door to a late-model car, getting in and driving away after what was apparently a short day of theatrical work.
I know two things now that I didn’t know then.
First, I now know that my hand did what human hands were designed to do. Research suggests that we are hard-wired with a strong and intuitive moral impulse — an urge to help others that is every bit as basic as the selfish urges that get all the press. Infants as young as 18 months will spontaneously comfort those who appear distressed and help those who are having difficulty retrieving or balancing objects. Chimpanzees will do the same, though not so reliably, which has led scientists to speculate about the precise point in our evolutionary history at which we became the “hypercooperative” species that out-nices the rest.
The second thing I know now that I didn’t know then is that this was the most damaging crime I had ever experienced. Like most residents of large cities, I’d been a victim before — of burglary once, of vandalism several times. But this was different. The burglars and vandals had taken advantage of my forgetfulness (“Why didn’t I double lock the door?”) and taught me to be better.
But the actor on 68th Street had taken advantage of my helpfulness and taught me to be worse. The hand that had automatically reached for my wallet had been slapped, and once slapped was twice shy. I’ve never again given money to a stranger without scrutinizing him for the signs that distinguish suffering from its imitation. And because I don’t know what those signs are, I typically just walk by.
Now corporate America has taken a lesson from the guild of shameless grifters. Nissan’s plan to leave those 20,000 sets of keys in public venues is every bit as crafty as the fraudulent performance that a decade ago left me with holes in both my pocketbook and soul. There is no selfish reason to bend down and pick up a key ring, but Nissan knows that we will bend without thinking because the impulse to help is bred into our marrow. Our best instinct will be awakened by a key ring and then punished by a commercial. Like rubes throughout the ages, we will be lured by a false cry of distress and quickly cured of our innocence and compassion.
We are used to commercial tricks that play on our fears. The official-looking letter marked “Verification Audit” is actually a magazine subscription renewal form; the credit card company’s ominous call to “discuss your account” is actually an attempt to sell new services.
Should we now get used to commercial tricks that play on our humanity? How would we feel about a device planted in trash bins that screams “I’m stuck!” until the lid is opened, at which point it continues, “Stuck in a dead end job, that is — and if you are too, then let us show you how to make millions in real estate with no money down”? Is it O.K. to send a thousand doleful puppies into the streets with tags that say: “Thanks for checking. And speaking of checking, our bank charges no monthly fees”?
What happens to us when greed masquerades as need, when cries for help become casting calls for chumps, when our most noble actions make us patsies? “You put an idea out there and seed it,” said the president of the advertising agency that came up with Nissan’s key ring ploy. “And people carry it for you.” Indeed they do. The idea being seeded and carried in this case is that the world cries wolf, that our moral impulse betrays us and that smart people should keep on walking.
Daniel Gilbert, a professor of psychology at Harvard, is the author of “Stumbling on Happiness.”
Sunday, March 25, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
I thought this was a very true article. I agree with the writer. I think there is too much fake stuff that plays with our emotions and make us think twice about helping. I know personally I am also very cautious of giving to people on the street because I feel that some of the money you just give to those people could end up going to things i don't want to support such as drugs or alcohol. I was told once that instead of giving money you should get food and give them food or you go buy whatever you feel they need and then give them that because then you control what they spend your money on. This is a good to still give to the community. On his other point about how commercials and advertising play to much on our giving instincts i think is true. His examples were very convincing. And i think that this makes people more cautious about trusting some companies.
I definitely agree with the authors claim. Society is using human kindness and our caring and considerate behaviour against us to bribe and lure us into completing tasks or revealing information to us. Just like the "homeless" man on the street who tricked the author into giving him money, society does the same in an attempt to gain our attention to a sale, or promotion, or business. The author says that society has, "taken advantage of my helpfulness and taught me to be worse". I completely agree with this statement. We are becoming used to the "tricks" and methods used by society, so if ever a person seriously and truly needed help, less people would comply in fear of falling for another scam.
I totally agree with this article and the author also. So much is going on each day in the world that takes our kindness for weakness. It's wrong for a person to give you something to help you when down but you to take advantage of it and ther's nothing really wrong with you. All the examples that were given in this article were true and convincing. By many people reading this article, they can be more aware of the things that go on in everyday life.
This article is very true. The author's message is that the world today toys with people's emotions in order to sell a product. I hate ads that make you feel so bad about something that you are willing to give so much money to help ou tthe cause because you do not know if the whole ad thing is a trick or if it is truth. The story that he told about the homeless looking man. We've all seen homeless people. You would love to give money but then again we have no idea what that person will do with that money. My neighbor went and gave a homeless man a sandwich. He said he was starving. Well, he didn't want the sandwich so that right there tells you that he was a fake. Stories like this make me more cautious as a person and a consumer.
This article brings up a good point in that advertisers will do almost anything to get us to buy their product. But I think it's very smart of them to lure us into buying their products because they don't make it so blatantly obvious. I think we're to blame, if we get reeled in into buying whatever it is they are selling. They have obviously spent some time thinking about what it takes for us to buy their product, and if we don't wisely think before purchasing, we can only blame ourselves. Clever marketing, if you don't think, you might just end up buying something you really don't want or need.
This artical states a true point. I definately agree with the authors point. Helping people is important and there are too many things that are trying to prevent us from helping people in need. If people keep crying wolf then eventually no one will help the people who are really in need. How are we supposed to trust people when the advertising companies make it hard to trust them.
The authors claim is that society today is using the human instincts and turning them against them. I agree with his argument because I also believe that society is using this characteristic badly. If people keep reaching out to help and keep being let down than they will never again be able to trust the system. Like the author states, "The hand that had automatically reached for my wallet had been slapped, and once slapped was twice shy." We are selves are hurting society today. Society is getting us to be the helpers and leading us to believe and do what they think is best.
I felt what the man was saying and why he now pass by strangers who ask for money on the streets. Like most cases the person more than likely is not homeless they are probably better off than you are, but there are some who are homeless and need the help. As a person who lives a comfortable life if I have the extra change or something I give it to them without questioning and what they do with the money or whatever is on them becasue I will still get my blessing because my heart was in the right place.
as i read all of the article it just made me agree with his claim more and more. i dont think anyone should have the right to play with someones emotions just to get what they want.
Post a Comment